NFFE
National Federation of Federal Employees
An affiliation of the
International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO
Press Release 1/14/08 For Information: Charles Paidock, RVP, Chicago, IL
NFFE/GSA
National Council (312)
353-0830 charles.paidock@gov
Federal Employees Targeted by Department
of Homeland Security
For Challenging
Background Investigations
A union officer was disciplined for challenging background investigations of employees in the federal government, regardless of how many years they had been with the government. On January 2, 2008, Charles Paidock, the Great Lakes Regional Vice President for the National Federation of Federal Employees, was ordered to return to his position as a Program Operations Clerk, and would be authorized to engage in union activities only if he stated what he would be doing to his immediate supervisor, and this was approved by him.
Mr. Paidock had requested
negotiations with the General Services Administration (GSA) in accordance with
the contract in effect, and the Federal Labor Management Relations
Statute. The agency, however, refused
to meet and discuss this with representatives of employees. Mr. Paidock then filed an Unfair Labor
Practice Charge with the Federal Labor Relations Authority, alleging that the
agency refused to bargain in good faith on a negotiable matter.
The agency simply stated that
records of 720 employees were “missing,” and in compliance with a Department of
Homeland Security directive, that investigations would be undertaken. An employee targeted for an investigation,
and who “failed,” could be removed from their position in the federal
government. The investigations were being
conducted by personnel under contract with the federal government, which raised
concerns by the union.
A “Letter of Instruction” was issued
to Mr. Paidock, a preliminary step is the discipline process, alleging that Mr.
Paidock had represented employees outside of the Midwest. Mr. Paidock had been designated as the Chief
Negotiator by the Union, given that he has over 25 years of experience in
negotiations, and had recently handled other nationwide matters.
Mr. Paidock stated that “we have
never claimed that the government cannot determine who works there, however, we
can see to it that there is just cause for removing someone, and make other
appropriate arrangements for anyone who might be adversely affected by a change
in the conditions of employment. The
agency just wanted me out of the way so they could do whatever they wanted, to
whomever they wanted.”
The Union intends to file another
Unfair Labor Practice Charge, regarding the agency’s attempt to determine who
it sends to the table to representative employees.