Union
Sounds Alarm Over Background Checks for New ID
By
Stephen Barr
Washington Post Tuesday,
June 12, 2007; D04
Some federal employees are
smarting over their smart-card treatment.
Background investigations of
federal and contract workers being conducted for a new government-wide
identification card, which carries a computer chip, have drawn objections at
two agencies and rumblings of concern at others.
The National Federation of
Federal Employees has raised questions about the background checks on behalf of
its unionized members at the General Services
Administration. Four research scientists at the Jet
Propulsion Laboratory in California
have written to members of Congress and contacted NASA
officials to make clear their opposition to the background checks.
The Bush administration's goal
is to replace the multiple ID cards used in the government with a single
"smart" card that will verify a person's identity and give him or her
access to federal buildings and permission to log on to government computer
networks. The cards are being issued in phases, with agencies facing a deadline
of late 2008.
Before cards are issued,
federal employees and contractors must provide fingerprints and disclose
financial, medical and other personal data. The forms filled out by employees
and contractors are matched against databases to verify the information. For
some employees holding sensitive jobs, agents are sent to interview neighbors.
Some employees are nervous
that they could lose their jobs if their agencies take a dim view of excessive
credit card debt, unpaid parking tickets or restraining orders issued in
divorce proceedings. Some employees also are concerned about the potential for
identity theft if their personal information is stolen or lost from a database.
Charles Paidock, a vice
president for the National Federation of Federal Employees in Chicago,
said he has been asking: "Are innocent careers going to be damaged as a
result of this?"
Federal officials said that
the background checks are not new and that most federal employees undergo them
when first hired and should have follow-up checks every few years. But, in a
change, all contractors -- not just those involved in national security or who
handle classified information -- must undergo the background check if they work
in federal buildings or have access to federal computers.
Kathy Dillaman, who
oversees investigative services at the Office of
Personnel Management, said the information being collected is to
determine whether a person meets certain character and conduct standards
necessary for carrying out a government job and, where appropriate, for use in
granting security clearances.
If the background check turns
up information that may result in a firing or period of debarment from federal
employment, the employee will have an opportunity to review the information and
offer an explanation, she said.
Information collected about
contract employees also is used by agencies to make so-called suitability
determinations or to grant clearances. The information is not shared with the
person's company for employment purposes, Dillaman said.
President Bush
issued a directive in 2004 requiring a new ID card to help deter terrorists,
criminals and computer hackers.
The cards, which resemble
credit cards, are embedded with a computer chip that permits an exchange of
data with another system.
In addition to building access,
smart cards can be used to supplement passwords for logging on to computers,
with users inserting the card into readers on their desktops.
Paidock said the union wants
to make sure the smart-card program is administered fairly and without
prejudice. "The issues are how far do they go, how aggressively do they do
it," he said of the background checks.
The NASA scientists have
written Reps. Rush D. Holt (D-N.J.) and Vernon J. Ehlers
(R-Mich.) to express concern that the implementation of Bush's order "has
created severe threats to the privacy rights of scientists and others, whether
or not they are federal employees." A spokesman for Holt said the concerns
raised by the scientists are being studied.
Agency spokesmen said they are
doing as much as they can to be open about their procedures for implementing
the smart-card requirements. "It is a change," said Bob Jacobs,
a NASA spokesman. "The government changed after 9/11 and has implemented
different levels of security."
Stephen
Barr's e-mail address isbarrs@washpost.com.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Forwarded by www.NFFEGSA.org